California Prop 65

what is proposition 65?

In 1986, California voters approved an initiative addressing growing public concerns over exposure to toxic chemicals. This initiative became the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as Proposition 65.

Proposition 65 mandates that the State publish and maintain a list of chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. First published in 1987 with approximately 30 chemicals, this list must be updated at least annually and has since expanded to include roughly 800 substances.

The law requires businesses to notify Californians about significant exposures to listed chemicals occurring through products they purchase, in their homes or workplaces, or from environmental releases. By providing this information, Proposition 65 empowers Californians to make informed decisions to protect themselves. Additionally, the law prohibits California businesses from knowingly discharging significant amounts of listed chemicals into sources of drinking water.

The Proposition 65 program is administered by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). OEHHA is also responsible for evaluating all relevant scientific information on substances being considered for addition to the Proposition 65 list.

how is a chemical added to the list?
The list encompasses a wide range of naturally occurring and synthetic chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. These include additives or ingredients found in pesticides, common household products, food, drugs, dyes, and solvents. Listed chemicals may also be utilized in industrial, commercial, and consumer contexts, including manufacturing, construction, or as byproducts of chemical processes – such as motor vehicle exhaust.  
how is a chemical added to the list?
Chemicals are added to the Proposition 65 list through four distinct mechanisms.


1. Scientific Committee Determination: A chemical can be listed if either of two independent, governor-appointed scientific committees – the Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC) or the Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant (DART) Identification Committee – finds it has been clearly shown to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. These committees, designated as the “State’s Qualified Experts” and part of OEHHA’s Science Advisory Board, base their decisions on the most current scientific evidence, compiled by OEHHA staff scientists. Public comments are also considered before final determinations are made.

2. Authoritative Body Identification: Listing can occur if an organization formally designated as an “authoritative body” by the CIC or DART Identification Committee has identified the chemical as causing cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. Currently designated authoritative bodies include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), National Toxicology Program (NTP), and International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

3. Government-Mandated Labeling: A chemical must be listed if a state or federal agency requires it to be labeled or identified as causing cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. Most chemicals listed via this pathway are prescription drugs that the U.S. FDA mandates carry such warnings.

4. California Labor Code Specification: The fourth mechanism mandates the inclusion of chemicals meeting specific scientific criteria and identified in the California Labor Code as causing cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. This method established the initial Proposition 65 list in 1986 and continues to serve as a basis for listing when applicable.

what requirements does proposition 65 place on companies doing business in california?

Businesses are required to provide a “clear and reasonable” warning prior to knowingly and intentionally exposing individuals to a listed chemical. This warning obligation can be fulfilled through various methods, including product labeling, posting workplace signs, distributing notices in rental housing complexes, or publishing notices in newspapers. Businesses have 12 months from a chemical’s listing date to comply with warning requirements.

Furthermore, Proposition 65 prohibits businesses operating within California from knowingly discharging listed chemicals into sources of drinking water. Compliance with this discharge prohibition must be achieved within 20 months of a chemical’s listing.

Exemptions:

  1. Business Size: Businesses with fewer than 10 employees and government agencies are exempt from both the warning requirements and the discharge prohibition.

  2. De Minimis Exposure: Businesses are also exempt if the exposures they cause are sufficiently low as to pose no significant risk of cancer or pose no observable effect level for birth defects or other reproductive harm.

Health risks associated with these exposures are explained in more detail below.

what does a warning mean?

Basis for Warnings:
The presence of a Proposition 65 warning on a product label, at a workplace, business, or in rental housing signifies the issuing entity’s awareness or belief that one or more listed chemicals are present. Businesses must provide such warnings unless exposures fall below established “safe harbor” thresholds:

  • No Significant Risk Level (NSRL) for carcinogens, or

  • Maximum Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for reproductive toxins.


Defining Safe Harbor Thresholds:

  1. For Carcinogens:
    The NSRL represents the exposure level estimated to result in not more than one excess cancer case per 100,000 individuals over a 70-year lifetime of exposure. Exposure at or below the NSRL corresponds to a lifetime cancer risk of ≤1 in 100,000.

  2. For Reproductive Toxins:
    The MADL is derived by taking the “No Observable Effect Level” (NOEL) – the highest dose level at which no reproductive harm is observed in humans or laboratory animals – and applying a 1,000-fold safety margin (MADL = NOEL ÷ 1,000). A warning is required if exposure exceeds the MADL.


Safe Harbor Numbers & Compliance Options:
OEHHA develops numerical “safe harbor levels” (NSRLs and MADLs) to assist businesses in determining when warnings are mandatory or discharges prohibited.

However, businesses retain flexibility:

  • They may issue warnings based solely on knowledge or assumption of a listed chemical’s presence, without conducting exposure assessments.

  • OEHHA does not maintain records of warnings issued or their justification, as businesses are not required to report this information.

For specific warning details – including the identity of chemicals, their concentrations, and exposure pathways – contact the business that issued the warning.

what are safe harbor numbers?

As defined above, OEHHA establishes safe harbor levels to provide compliance guidance for businesses. These levels determine whether:

  • A Proposition 65 warning is required, or

  • Discharges into drinking water sources are prohibited.

Businesses qualify for “safe harbor” exemption from these requirements if exposures to listed chemicals occur at or below the applicable level. Specifically:

  • No Significant Risk Levels (NSRLs) apply to carcinogens

  • Maximum Allowable Dose Levels (MADLs) apply to reproductive toxins

To date, OEHHA has established over 300 distinct safe harbor levels and continues to develop additional levels for listed chemicals.

what if there is no safe harbor level?

Absence of Safe Harbor Levels:
If no safe harbor level exists for a listed chemical, businesses exposing individuals to that chemical must provide a Proposition 65 warningunless they can demonstrate that the anticipated exposure:

  • Poses no significant risk of cancer (for carcinogens), or

  • Falls below the threshold for observable reproductive harm (for reproductive toxins).

Guidance for Exposure Assessment:
OEHHA’s regulations (Title 27, California Code of Regulations, Article 7 & Article 8) provide methodologies for calculating acceptable exposure levels when safe harbor levels are unavailable. Given the complexity of exposure determination:

  • Businesses bear the burden of proof for justifying warning exemptions.

  • Unnecessary warnings are strongly discouraged.

  • Consult qualified professionals if exposure levels may fall below risk thresholds.

who enforces proposition 65?

Enforcement of Proposition 65:
Primary enforcement authority rests with the California Attorney General’s Office. Additionally:

  • District Attorneys may enforce the law statewide.

  • City Attorneys (in cities exceeding 750,000 residents) hold concurrent enforcement powers.

  • Public interest litigants may initiate private enforcement actions through civil lawsuits against non-compliant businesses.

Penalties:
Violations for failure to provide required warnings carry civil penalties of up to $2,500 per violation, per day.

how is proposition 65 meeting its goal of reducing exposure to hazardous chemicals in california

Since its passage in 1986, Proposition 65 has equipped Californians with critical information to reduce exposures to listed chemicals potentially underregulated by other state or federal laws. This landmark legislation has also significantly elevated public awareness of the health risks associated with these chemicals. A prime example is the heightened understanding of the dangers of alcohol consumption during pregnancy, making alcohol warnings among the most visible public health outcomes of Proposition 65.

The law’s warning mandate has catalyzed product reformulation, driving manufacturers to eliminate listed chemicals. Notable successes include:

  • The removal of carcinogenic trichloroethylene from most correction fluids

  • Reformulated paint strippers free of methylene chloride (a known carcinogen)

  • The phase-out of toluene (a reproductive toxin) from many nail care products

Furthermore, Proposition 65 enforcement has:

  • Reduced lead content in ceramic tableware

  • Eliminated lead-containing foil caps on wine bottles

  • Driven measurable reductions in California air emissions of listed chemicals like ethylene oxide, hexavalent chromium, and chloroform.

While delivering substantial public health benefits, Proposition 65 has imposed compliance costs on businesses operating in California. These include expenses related to product testing, developing safer alternatives, reducing discharges, and providing warnings. Acknowledging these impacts, OEHHA remains committed to:

  1. Ensuring clear regulatory requirements

  2. Maintaining rigorous scientific standards for chemical listings

  3. Conducting all processes through transparent public proceedings

where can i get more information on proposition 65?

For general information on the Proposition 65 list of chemicals, you may contact OEHHA’s Proposition 65 program at (916) 445-6900, or visit http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65.html. For enforcement information, contact the California Attorney General’s Office at (510) 622-2160, or visit http://ag.ca.gov/prop65/